The Canned Beer Stigma is Alive and Well

by Billy Broas

Sam Adams Facebook

Living in Colorado, you don’t have to convince anyone that good beer can come in a can. When Oskar Blues, Avery, and New Belgium are in your state, you learn this fact at a young age. Even most craft beers drinkers outside of Colorado know that great beers are being put into cans and that’s OK.

But we’re in the minority.

To prove this, you don’t have to look any further than Samuel Adams. This past summer they released their first beer, the iconic Boston Lager, in a can. A quiet few praised them for the move, but a large number of very vocal fans chastised them. You can witness the backlash on their Facebook page anytime they post a picture of their can. See for yourself.

Here are a few chosen comments so you can see what I’m talking about:

LOTS of people hate the idea of beer in cans

LOTS of people hate the idea of good beer in cans

Like I said, the stigma is alive and well…

It’s easy to read these comments and call them idiots (guilty), but they’re really just misinformed. We live in the craft beer bubble and they are on the outside. They don’t know how cans are better for the beer by keeping out light and oxygen. They don’t realize that they’re lighter and can go places that bottles can’t go. They don’t know about Burning Can. They definitely don’t know about this:

Heady Topper Beer Review

Heady Topper has a 100 rating on Beer Advocate.

Whenever I come into contact with someone who says “Good beer doesn’t come in cans”, I always mention Heady Topper. It’s like taking a machine gun to a knife fight – you can’t lose.

Unfortunately we can’t send a can of Heady Topper to everyone in the country, so this stigma will continue for a while. At least things are going in the right direction. There are more can supporters today than there were yesterday. It still never ceases to amaze me not just how many people are anti-can, but how vehemently against cans they are.

Do you know people who are still very much anti-can?

Related Post:


billybrew-hba-banner

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

Ray September 17, 2013 at 1:51 pm

Dale’s Pale Ale comes in cans, and only cans. It’s fantastic! Heck, you’re going to pour it into a glass anyway, right? Really the best way to preserve freshness in a beer. No light or oxygen damage.

Reply

Billy Broas September 18, 2013 at 8:17 am

Exactly Ray. I’d argue that Dale’s has done more to combat the stigma than any other beer, being the first craft beer in a can.

Reply

PA_Jeff September 17, 2013 at 2:03 pm

…yet they’re probably not anti- clear/green bottles. You can’t really blame them though – good beer *hasn’t* been in cans until recently. Any “craft” beer was only in bottles. Their opinion just isn’t changing as quickly as the market is….

Reply

Billy Broas September 18, 2013 at 8:19 am

Right you never hear the same complaints about Newcastle and its clear bottle. And like Ray said above, it’s meant to be poured out regardless of the vessel.

Reply

JL September 17, 2013 at 8:36 pm

Two words …. Sun King. Can’t do anything about the uneducated masses than don’t / won’t get it.

Reply

Billy Broas September 18, 2013 at 8:19 am

Ah yes another great one.

Reply

Sheppy September 18, 2013 at 5:22 am

Well, it wasn’t too long ago that Jim Koch said he would never package in a can. There are a couple other craft brewers who say the same thing. I think it will just take time and education to get everyone on the same page.

It is another great reason to live in Colorado. People here just “get it”. With Oskar Blues being the ones who started craft beer in a can, it is part of our DNA.

Reply

Billy Broas September 18, 2013 at 8:20 am

I remember him saying that. Another one I wish would come around is Odell. I was at an event where the brewer said they wouldn’t do it mostly for image reasons. It’s disappointing, especially because so many of their CO comrades have made the switch.

Reply

Sheppy September 18, 2013 at 8:59 am

I would almost argue that here in Colorado, trying to decide what to do based on “image” would tend to move a brewer towards canning. The “peer pressure” is certainly swinging that way. I cannot think of very many Colorado Brewers who don’t can at least some of their beers.

As a Colorado consumer, I seek out cans because most of the commercial beer I drink is while camping and/or hiking and/or biking. Dealing with cans is much easier in those situations than bottles. Of course, I love Odell beer, so just because they don’t can doesn’t mean I don’t drink their beer, but I would almost certainly drink more of their beer if they started packaging in cans.

Odell, of course, has a pretty big national footprint, so maybe they just need to wait for some of their other markets to catch up on the education. I bet that eventually they’ll join in.

Reply

Curt September 18, 2013 at 7:51 am

I know its not a craft beer but Foster’s Lager in the classic Oil Can will always remain one of my early beer drinking favorites. Actually can’t drink it from a bottle although they made/make them.

Reply

Billy Broas September 18, 2013 at 8:21 am

Nostalgia certainly plays a part. Plus you can’t ignore the physical dangers of shotgunning out of a bottle.

Reply

Dan K. September 18, 2013 at 11:28 am

I have no problem with a canned beer, as long as I do have a glass to pour it in. If I am drinking straight from the vessel itself, yes I want it in a bottle. Drinking straight from the can tends to give off a metallic taste if you ask me.

Reply

Nitch September 20, 2013 at 12:14 pm

“Misinformed”? Much like racism and what not, I’d say. People are so quick to bitch.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: